AMALGAMS 101: THE DANGERS UNCOVERED

For more than a century, “silver” dental fillings have been sold as routine and harmless. Few patients are told that these restorations are actually dental amalgams—a metal mixture that is roughly 50% elemental mercury by weight.U.S. Food and Drug Administration When placed into a warm, acidic, constantly grinding environment like the human mouth, these fillings can slowly release mercury vapour, which is inhaled into the lungs, absorbed into the bloodstream, and distributed to organs and tissues.

Mercury itself is not a minor contaminant. The World Health Organization classifies it as one of the top ten chemicals of major public-health concern because of its toxic effects on the nervous, immune, and digestive systems, as well as the kidneys, lungs, skin, and eyes—even at relatively low levels of exposure.World Health Organization Earlier WHO analyses have identified dental amalgam as the largest source of mercury vapour exposure for the general population in non-industrial settings.World Health Organization

Regulators now acknowledge that certain groups are more vulnerable to mercury from amalgams, including pregnant women, children, people with kidney impairment, and those with heightened sensitivity or reduced capacity to clear mercury.U.S. Food and Drug Administration+1 Risk analyses indicate that mercury vapour can interfere with fetal and early childhood brain development, raising concern about even “low-level” exposure during critical windows.PubMed Autopsy and biomonitoring studies have consistently shown higher mercury levels in organs and fluids—such as brain, kidney, liver, placenta, and breast milk—in individuals who carry amalgam fillings compared with those who do not.IAOMT

This introductory segment frames dental amalgams not as inert relics of traditional dentistry, but as a continuous, internal source of a potent neurotoxin. For patients already struggling with unexplained neurological, immune, or metabolic symptoms, the mercury burden from their own teeth may be a missing piece of the diagnostic puzzle.

 TOP RELATED ARTICLES

Exploring High Mercury content

Mercury is a naturally occurring element found in air, water, and soil—but when it enters the human body, even in small amounts, it can cause serious harm. “Elevated mercury” refers to higher-than-normal levels detected in the blood, urine, or hair—an indicator of toxic exposure. The degree of elevation often reveals how, and how long, someone has been exposed.  ...More moderate exposure may stem from dental amalgams (“silver fillings”), broken thermometers, fluorescent bulbs, or industrial pollution. Inhalation of mercury vapors during home renovations or lab work can raise internal levels quickly. Pregnant women, children, and those with compromised detoxification capacity (such as certain genetic polymorphisms) are especially at risk. (Go to complete feature article)

---

How Metal Toxicity Ended a Surgeon’s Career and Sparked a Clinical Health Movement

Dr. Scott Schroeder never imagined that the very materials he once trusted to restore life would one day take his own career away. A skilled surgeon known for his precision and compassion, he spent decades healing others with the same surgical steel that would later become his enemy. His story—both tragic and transformative—has become a powerful testament to the hidden dangers of metal implants and the growing crisis of medical material sensitivity...When testing revealed his sensitivities, the findings were unmistakable: nickel, mercury, lead—and through cause and effect, titanium. Years earlier, dental amalgams containing mercury had already caused him chronic issues, and pushed his immune system beyond tolerance. (See complete feature with video)

---

The Awakening: When Pain Turns Desperate 

One defining case forever changed the course of Dr. Kelly Blodgett’s career—and, in many ways, the future of biological dentistry. A surgical nurse, once thriving and full of life, came to his practice in crisis. Her mouth contained ten dissimilar metals, each from a different manufacturer, creating a toxic electrical storm that her nervous system could no longer tolerate. What began as subtle discomfort escalated into a catastrophic decline—loss of motor control, blurred vision, and eventually suicidal ideation. When she called Dr. Blodgett’s office one Friday, saying she could no longer bear the pain, he immediately cleared his schedule. The following week, as he carefully removed each incompatible implant, something remarkable occurred: her clarity returned, her pain disappeared, and her emotions flooded back. “It was like someone flicked a switch,” Blodgett recalled. “Her brain and body came back online in real time.”  (Go to complete feature article)

---

Selected References

(1) World Health Organization. Mercury and Health (Fact sheet). Geneva: WHO; 2024.World Health Organization (2) World Health Organization. Mercury in Health Care. Geneva: WHO; 2005.World Health Organization (3) U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dental Amalgam Fillings. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2021.U.S. Food and Drug Administration (4) Berlin M. Mercury in dental amalgam: a risk analysis. J Dent. 2020.PubMed (5) International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT). Understanding Risk Assessment for Mercury From Dental Amalgam. 2017.IAOMT

 EPILOGUE

Beneath the Surface: A Physician’s Reckoning With Mercury, Memory, and Modern Testing
By Robert L. Bard, MD, DABR, FAIUM, FASLMS

IMPORTANT NOTE: My epilogue is not a condemnation of dentistry, military service, or medical tradition. It is a call to widen the investigative lens. Millions of individuals with amalgams have never been screened. Countless veterans assume their symptoms are unrelated to invisible exposures. We owe them—and ourselves—the science of looking deeper.

My career has been built on imaging—seeing what others cannot. Yet it wasn’t a scan, MRI, or ultrasound that revealed one of my most significant medical vulnerabilities. It was heavy metal testing—an area I once considered peripheral to conventional medicine—that forced me to confront a truth hiding in plain sight: the mercury burden I carried was not from a dramatic environmental disaster or a rare occupational mishap. It came from dental amalgams placed decades ago, long before we questioned their long-term toxicological consequences.

The catalyst was an OLIGOSCAN evaluation—initially performed out of curiosity, part of a broader investigation into diagnostic tools for toxin-linked diseases. The results showed elevated mercury. That single data point didn’t alarm me, but it demanded context. I turned to additional methods: MELISA testing to evaluate metal-induced immune reactivity, whole-blood mercury analysis, red blood cell mineral testing, and comprehensive serum panels. Each assessment captured a different physiologic signature, yet the pattern was unmistakable—chronic mercury exposure, consistent with retaining multiple amalgam fillings for much of my life.

For clinicians, this emerging clarity is uncomfortable. Amalgams were considered durable, economical, and harmless. But mercury is not inert. It can vaporize, migrate, and bioaccumulate—particularly in neural tissue. As a neurotoxin, it interferes with synaptic signaling, affects microvascular circulation, and disrupts mitochondrial metabolism. Patients do not present with a label saying “mercury toxicity.” Instead, they arrive with subtle neurologic decline, cognitive slowing, unexplained anxiety, sleep disruption, or sensory neuropathies—symptoms easily dismissed as aging or stress.

In my case, amalgams were not the entire story. I served in the military during periods when service members were routinely exposed to burn pits, chemical residues, fuel combustion, solvents, and contaminated soil. Agent Orange, though historically associated with dioxin toxicity, rarely traveled alone—environmental mixtures often carried metals and combustion byproducts. Military toxicology is rarely isolated; exposures stack over time. The body does not forget.

What I learned through this process is clinically humbling: heavy metals do not behave like transient infections or acute injuries. They are cumulative, synergistic, and patient-specific. Genetics, immune function, gut integrity, and detoxification capacity determine whether mercury becomes a tolerated passenger or a neurologic saboteur. Two individuals may carry identical amalgam loads and experience entirely different trajectories of health.

This realization reshaped my diagnostic philosophy. Heavy metal testing should not be reserved for industrial workers or environmental disasters. It belongs in the evaluation of chronic, unexplained, multisystem disorders—especially when neurological, endocrine, or autoimmune presentations overlap. OligoScan offers an accessible entry point, but confirmatory testing—MELISA, blood metal panels, urine challenge tests, and hair analysis—remains essential for clinical decision-making.

Because sometimes the greatest threat to our health is not external, but the toxic legacy we unknowingly carry within.